Monday, April 30, 2012

Review: We Run Sh*t



We Run Sh*t examines the struggle of five veteran event producers who travel to Miami during it's annual Winter Music Conference. They have the experience, the ambition and the connections to execute high caliber events but quickly realize they are dealing with the underbelly of the club scene in recession-fueled America. Platinum selling artists and spoiled celebrities are one thing, but mounting stress and the criminal corporate world are a whole different story. We Run Sh*t is a never-before-seen exposé into the darker side of nightlife entertainment.

That is what the filmmaker Michael Rogers would have you believe. However the film I saw was about a bunch of high-on-their-own-sh*t a-holes who get way over their heads trying to put on these events because they know nothing about the business. In fact, I am surprised Rogers tries to sell the film's characters as anything but jerks. These guys screw him over more than once in the film. I think the film may be Rogers attempt to make back some of the money they lost him. Perhaps it is a smart move that he didn't spend the whole film trying to chastise these guys as they make themselves look bad enough.

Enough about how little I liked these guys, let's talk about the doc itself. The film is candid, catching the ugly moments and generally making it's lead characters look inept. That is the best part about We Run Sh*t. It feels less self-censored that I expected. Unfortunately, past the candor the doc fails to engage. A large part of that is due to a lack of clear information. In a doc, we need facts to help us keep things clear and reinforce that what we are seeing is true to some degree. We Run Sh*t consistently leaves out big facts. At one point we see how much money is lost in the first two nights' events. However we don't ever get the numbers for the remaining three nights of events. This inconsistency in facts made me question if any of the doc was telling me the truth. Did they play up the losses for dramatic event? Were the remaining nights successful? These kind of questions point out the sloppiness with which this film is assembled. I think Rogers caught some candid moments but failed to put the whole situation together clearly and fails at giving us the facts we need to make any conclusions about the people involved.

We Run Sh*t never evolves into a story worthy of a feature documentary. This story would have been suited best for a one hour special on something like E!. The film does incorporate some candid moments and some slick animation at times, but overall it fails to engage its audience due to its lack of clarity, facts and likeable people.

7 comments:

  1. Even though I wrote and produced this film, I thought your rugged language (although there are 4 typos and massive grammatical errors) was hilarious. Cheers!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Bravo sir. And the fact that there were two directors on this film and you didn't seem to notice this is proof positive of the fact that you were most likely not even paying attention to what you were watching. Have a great day!

    ReplyDelete
  3. How can you not be involved with the characters? I am not apart of the film and loved Nico and Eclass. Obviously you have never had to run any kind of event or project that involved people. It is hard to run sh*t.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I actually know one of the filmmakers - Scott Storm, a VERY accomplished director in his own right. He previously directed the feature, TEN TIL NOON, which won a special jury prize at SLAMDANCE, and produced the wonderfully entertaining and informative documentary, OFFICIAL REJECTION, which educates many on the film festival system. As someone who works in the industry itself I enjoyed OR and can tell you it was very real. As for WE RUN SH*T - I enjoyed that, as well. I agree with about half your assessment that states, "The film does incorporate some candid moments and some slick animation at times ..." That was about the only part I agreed with. And, to not even mention Scott Storm as co-director was very strange. He probably wouldn't want me to post this, but as a working filmmaker myself, I do know the effort it takes to put into a film. This is a very harsh - and not totally accurate - review, devoid of "the facts we need to make any conclusions about the people involved," in it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just because Scott Storm has other work that has been well received, doesn't make We Run Sh*t good. The fact that one would have to bring up a co-director's previous work to defend We Run Sh*t really says all you need to know about this documentary. Just because Director A makes Movie A and it's great, doesn't mean Movie B is going to be any good.

      Scott Storm may very well be a great director that makes plenty of quality work. No one is attacking him or saying any different. Same goes for Rogers. Official Rejection is great, but We Run Sh*t is not Offical Rejection.

      This documentary, on it's own, isn't very good. Too many key elements were left out for us to come to a conculsion on it. And it wasn't engaging. Admittedly, I have no interest in these type of party events. I have no problem with them, but they're not my thing. Perhaps that's what I wasn't engaged, but a good documentary should be able to reach out and pull people in that may not normally have much of an interest in the subject matter.

      Also, why is it harsh for someone to give their opinion on a film they watched?

      Delete
  5. Oddmanic - After seeing the film I don't know if I would be openly admitting to that...but hey, it's your reputation.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This has to be the worst film I have ever seen in my life. Half way through, I was ready to jab my own eyes out with a fork to end my suffering.

    ReplyDelete